Vice President Dick Cheney underwent an examination for an irregular heartbeat. During the examination doctors discovered that the irregular beat was actually caused by gas and that the Vice President is missing a heart. “This is very rare,” commented one of the physicians treating the Vice President. The physician went on to say that Mr. Cheney was the first patient lacking a heart that he had encountered during his career as a cardiologist. He explained that in the past there have been speculations that such men as Genghis Khan, Napoleon, Stalin, Pol Pot, and Adolf Hitler might have lacked a heart; however, either empirical evidence unavailable because the body had been destroyed or was never found or a heart had been found, even if severely diseased. "Nevertheless," the doctor said, "a human being without a heart is not a contradiction and therefore not logically impossible."
Political scientists and philosophers quickly began speculating on the possibility that had the Vice President had a heart, that perhaps the war in Iraq may have been avoided and that the billions of dollars spent on the war might have been devoted to addressing urgent needs in America, such as water shortages; the spread of disease; mortgage foreclosures; deteriorating infrastructure such as schools, bridges, and dams; and the growing homeless populations.
Some scientists have even speculated that President George Bush himself, and perhaps even Donald Rumsfeld and Karl Rove, could be lacking a heart; however, the president turned down a request to be examined.
When asked about how Cheney’s condition would be treated, the doctor leading Cheney’s medical team said that a mechanical heart was being considered.
Tuesday, November 27, 2007
Thursday, November 22, 2007
Americans Have Less to Be Thankful for This Thanksgiving
That American have less to be thankful for this Thanksgiving was a thought that came to my mind as I was reading Ruben Navarrett’s recent propaganda piece title “Honesty in the Immigration Debate.” Navarrett begins by saying “Bill Richardson rocks.” Well of course he does. Richardson is a Hispanic and one of Mexico’s key allies in its invasion of America.
Navarrett suggests that Richardson is auditioning for a vice presidential nomination and recognizes that “the audition is going well.” If Richardson is successful, America will be only one heartbeat from becoming a Hispanic nation. Thus Navarrett’s excitement is understandable. Imagine President Richardson vetoing every bill that he considers anti-immigrant. And imagine all the federal judges and thousands of other appointees having Spanish surnames.
Navarrett thought it was terrific how Richardson characterized as dysfunctional the porous border with Mexico, the bottleneck immigration program, the U.S. Congress’ inept handling of immigration, and the political discussion of illegal immigration. Most Americans would agree and believe the solution would be to shut down the border altogether, but that would require bringing home U.S. troops so they could protect the home front. Of course, that is not what Navarrett has in mind, which is to have no border at all with Mexico.
He criticizes Americans for “falling into old habits and repeating familiar depiction of immigrants—legal or illegal—as inferior to natives, defective in their culture, slow to assimilate, prone to criminal activity, and devoid of any positive values. However, the 1996 National Youth Gang Survey revealed that Hispanics make up the largest portion of gang membership—44 percent. The high school drop-out rate for Hispanics 45 percent. Concerning sexually transmitted disease the National Library for Medicine said that the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) reported that in 1991 the rates of reported congenital syphilis cases among Hispanics were substantially above the national average for non-Hispanic whites as were rates of primary and secondary syphilis. Finally, one report warned that while overall illegal drug use among U.S. teens was down, Hispanic teens' use of marijuana, cocaine, heroin and methamphetamine outpaced use by their white and black peers. In other words, by allowing the Hispanic invasion, American is importing the problems associated with third-world nations.
These are just some of the inconvenient truths that one can find about Hispanics living in America (and the news south of the border, which Navarrette also ignores, is not any brighter). Why the blinders? Because Navarrette is a Hispanic rhetorician whose job it is to pangloss the effects of Hispanic immigrants upon American society. But these problems are not the key issue for millions of Americans. The Hispanicization of American’s communities is. In other words, most Americans do not what America transformed into Amerxico, regardless of how attractive Hispanic culture might be to Navarrette and Richardson.
And why is it that Canadians are not invading America? Because Canadians have not created a dysfunctional society. The unpleasant fact here is that there is a fundamental difference between Canadian and Mexican cultures.
Navarrett says “Amen” to Richardson’s saying, “We should stop demonizing immigrants.” Well of course Richardson and Navarrett would believe this: they are Hispanics. But from the perspective of Americans, the Hispanic invasion is a threat to America in the same way demons were thought to be a threat to individuals. Remember Rosemary’s Baby? Well, that is what is happening to America: it is being possessed by an alien culture. It is the act of possessing and transforming that is demonic, not necessarily the people themselves (though Hispanic drug cartels and street gangs look pretty demonic).
Navarrett applauds Gov. Schwarzenegger’s saying that Americans should channel “their anger over illegal immigration toward the federal government and not toward immigrants.” But this is a red herring argument designed to distract from the main issue: that Hispanics have illegally invaded America and have become the seeds of a multitude of social, economic, and cultural problems in this country. As far as the federal government is concerned, the U.S. government is already an object of Americans’ fear and loathing.
Finally, Navarrett accuses those who are critical of immigrants as being racist. He does this by saying that the critics’ defending themselves will tell you that their “angst” is caused only by those who enter the country illegally, not by immigrants who enter the county legally. He calls this defense a “lovely sound bite.”
Angst is a form of fear, and what Americans fear is the loss of their homeland, which is what Mexico and many Mexican organizations have in mind for much of the United States. It has already occurred in many parts of the country. Recently, a friend told me he went into a Wal-Mart in Albuquerque, New Mexico, and everyone was speaking Spanish. It was as if he were in Mexico. He joked that they would have to provide him with a translator in order to check out. So yes, Americans would also object to tens of millions of immigrants legally entering their country—because legal or illegal, mass immigration will mean the destruction of the integrity of American culture. And when that occurs, Hispanics living in America will still have their national homes, such as Mexico; it will be Americans who be homeless.
So Americans have less to be thankful for this Thanksgiving. They have an economy running on four flat tires (public and private debt, a dollar on life-supports, the price of oil approaching $100 a barrel, and a collapsed housing market); they are fighting and losing wars at home and abroad; like Othello, they have squandered their reputation abroad (being seen as both evil and ridiculous); their politicians have become America’s firing squad; and their nation is being eroded by immigrants, so that by the end of the century their grandchildren will be aliens in what was once their homeland (and Thanksgiving dinner will consist of enchiladas, tacos, tamales, and sopaipillas, eaten in celebration of the birth of the new Hispanic Nation). Bon Appétit!
Navarrett suggests that Richardson is auditioning for a vice presidential nomination and recognizes that “the audition is going well.” If Richardson is successful, America will be only one heartbeat from becoming a Hispanic nation. Thus Navarrett’s excitement is understandable. Imagine President Richardson vetoing every bill that he considers anti-immigrant. And imagine all the federal judges and thousands of other appointees having Spanish surnames.
Navarrett thought it was terrific how Richardson characterized as dysfunctional the porous border with Mexico, the bottleneck immigration program, the U.S. Congress’ inept handling of immigration, and the political discussion of illegal immigration. Most Americans would agree and believe the solution would be to shut down the border altogether, but that would require bringing home U.S. troops so they could protect the home front. Of course, that is not what Navarrett has in mind, which is to have no border at all with Mexico.
He criticizes Americans for “falling into old habits and repeating familiar depiction of immigrants—legal or illegal—as inferior to natives, defective in their culture, slow to assimilate, prone to criminal activity, and devoid of any positive values. However, the 1996 National Youth Gang Survey revealed that Hispanics make up the largest portion of gang membership—44 percent. The high school drop-out rate for Hispanics 45 percent. Concerning sexually transmitted disease the National Library for Medicine said that the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) reported that in 1991 the rates of reported congenital syphilis cases among Hispanics were substantially above the national average for non-Hispanic whites as were rates of primary and secondary syphilis. Finally, one report warned that while overall illegal drug use among U.S. teens was down, Hispanic teens' use of marijuana, cocaine, heroin and methamphetamine outpaced use by their white and black peers. In other words, by allowing the Hispanic invasion, American is importing the problems associated with third-world nations.
These are just some of the inconvenient truths that one can find about Hispanics living in America (and the news south of the border, which Navarrette also ignores, is not any brighter). Why the blinders? Because Navarrette is a Hispanic rhetorician whose job it is to pangloss the effects of Hispanic immigrants upon American society. But these problems are not the key issue for millions of Americans. The Hispanicization of American’s communities is. In other words, most Americans do not what America transformed into Amerxico, regardless of how attractive Hispanic culture might be to Navarrette and Richardson.
And why is it that Canadians are not invading America? Because Canadians have not created a dysfunctional society. The unpleasant fact here is that there is a fundamental difference between Canadian and Mexican cultures.
Navarrett says “Amen” to Richardson’s saying, “We should stop demonizing immigrants.” Well of course Richardson and Navarrett would believe this: they are Hispanics. But from the perspective of Americans, the Hispanic invasion is a threat to America in the same way demons were thought to be a threat to individuals. Remember Rosemary’s Baby? Well, that is what is happening to America: it is being possessed by an alien culture. It is the act of possessing and transforming that is demonic, not necessarily the people themselves (though Hispanic drug cartels and street gangs look pretty demonic).
Navarrett applauds Gov. Schwarzenegger’s saying that Americans should channel “their anger over illegal immigration toward the federal government and not toward immigrants.” But this is a red herring argument designed to distract from the main issue: that Hispanics have illegally invaded America and have become the seeds of a multitude of social, economic, and cultural problems in this country. As far as the federal government is concerned, the U.S. government is already an object of Americans’ fear and loathing.
Finally, Navarrett accuses those who are critical of immigrants as being racist. He does this by saying that the critics’ defending themselves will tell you that their “angst” is caused only by those who enter the country illegally, not by immigrants who enter the county legally. He calls this defense a “lovely sound bite.”
Angst is a form of fear, and what Americans fear is the loss of their homeland, which is what Mexico and many Mexican organizations have in mind for much of the United States. It has already occurred in many parts of the country. Recently, a friend told me he went into a Wal-Mart in Albuquerque, New Mexico, and everyone was speaking Spanish. It was as if he were in Mexico. He joked that they would have to provide him with a translator in order to check out. So yes, Americans would also object to tens of millions of immigrants legally entering their country—because legal or illegal, mass immigration will mean the destruction of the integrity of American culture. And when that occurs, Hispanics living in America will still have their national homes, such as Mexico; it will be Americans who be homeless.
So Americans have less to be thankful for this Thanksgiving. They have an economy running on four flat tires (public and private debt, a dollar on life-supports, the price of oil approaching $100 a barrel, and a collapsed housing market); they are fighting and losing wars at home and abroad; like Othello, they have squandered their reputation abroad (being seen as both evil and ridiculous); their politicians have become America’s firing squad; and their nation is being eroded by immigrants, so that by the end of the century their grandchildren will be aliens in what was once their homeland (and Thanksgiving dinner will consist of enchiladas, tacos, tamales, and sopaipillas, eaten in celebration of the birth of the new Hispanic Nation). Bon Appétit!
Sunday, November 18, 2007
America’s Last Chance To Remain American
Ruben Navarrette, a Hispanic propagandist and spokesperson for the San Diego Union-Tribune, says it isn’t too late for Republican politicians to woo Hispanic voters. Of course, he is speaking on the behalf of Hispanics in general and Mexican illegal immigrants in particular, not Americans. In his articles it is as if Americans do not exist, only U.S. politicians and Hispanics, in other words, as if America has already become a Hispanic Nation. From a slightly different perspective, Navarrette’s role is that of a representative of Mexico negotiating America’s surrender in the present Mexican-American War. Let’s call it MAWII. You will notice that he is smiling in his photograph, and he has every reason to smile because this time around it looks like Mexico is going to win the war. Thus, America is in one of those rare situations in which a nation is losing two wars at once, one abroad and one at home.
In his article “Still a Chance To Woo Hispanic Voters” Navarrette refers to the GOP “condemning itself to years in the electoral wilderness by alienating an influential constituency.” In other words, the Republican Party should get out of the electoral wilderness by selling out to that influential constituency the people who have been invading the country for the last half-century and who are more committed to Mexico and the political party of La Raza Unida than to America or to either of its major political parties.*
The reason Navarrette is appealing to Republican politicians is because America has already been sold out to the illegal aliens by the Democratic Party either for votes or their Marxist ideology (that Americans should surrender their nation to the world’s downtrodden multitudes). The only difference between the democratic candidates in the presidential election is how much they are willing to grovel for Hispanic votes. Ironically, it is a Republican who may have set the lowest standard of obsequiousness, and that would be Senator John McCain. Among the Democratic candidates Senator Hillary Clinton most deserves the Benedict Arnold Medal of Dishonor for, as Navarrette puts it, “aggressively going after the Hispanic vote by racking up the endorsements of seemingly every Latino officeholder from East Los Angeles to the South Bronx.” In other words, voting for Hillary is raising the white flag of surrender to Mexico and the armies of illegals encamped in hundreds of cites across America.** Of course, she has been greatly helped by her husband Bill, whose sense of loyalty was pretty much demonstrated by his affair with Monica.
As you probably already know, Benedict Arnold was an American Revolutionary general and traitor whose planned to surrender West Point to the British for 20,000 pounds. The Benedict Arnold Medal of Dishonor should be given to American politicians who contribute to the surrender of America to those armies of the night that have been marching northward from Mexico, Central America, and South America into America. Of course, this means that most if not all Democratic politicians, many Republican politicians, and certainly the President of the United State should receive this medal.
Actually, Navarrette isn’t interest in the Republicans winning the election but only in Hispanics winning the election. And this should not be held against him. He is, first and foremost, a Chicano (note the title of his book A Darker Shade of Crimson: Odyssey of a Harvard Chicano) and totally committed to his people, unlike many Anglo-American politicians, businessmen, and American Catholics who are in favor of giving sanctuary to illegal immigrants. However, the Republicans can win the election without surrendering to the illegals if they are willing to be, unlike their rabid leader President Bush, flexible on some key and difficult issues. Two candidates who could pull this off are Thomas G. Tancredo and Michael D. Huckabee. The strategy would be to appeal to Democratic and undecided American voters, rather than to Hispanics, because what many Americans are looking for is a president who is interested in saving America for Americans and not for Mexico or the Hispanic Coalition called the Hispanic Nation.
What these politicians would need to do is create a triage that distinguishes the most important election issues from secondary issues. Below, some of those issues are examined.
Illegal Immigration
First and foremost, they should stand up against the illegal aliens and require that they return home and apply to enter the United States legally. Mexico is the greatest threat to the integrity of America, not Iraq***, not Iran, and not the terrorists. If Americans lose the present Mexican-American War, they can expect that their country will soon become totally criminalized as Mexico has been for decades if not forever. A glimpse of America’s Hispanicized future can be seen in a recent San Diego Union-Tribune article titled “Troubling Signs in Baja.” It describes recent attacks upon Americans foolish enough to visit Mexico by “paramilitary-style criminals.” Pat Weber, owner of San Diego Surfing Academy in Carlsbad, watched while Mexican gunmen “sexually assaulted his girlfriend before stealing $10,000 worth of computers, video cameras, and other gear.” Welcome to the land of Su Casa Es Mi Case. And as always, Mexican law-enforcement officers cannot be trusted because there is a good chance that they are corrupt and linked to criminal groups. Hundreds of cities and communities in the U.S. have already been criminalized by illegal aliens and their offspring. If it were not for Hispanic immigrants, the jails and prisons in California would not be overflowing. If Americans do not have the gumption to elect a president (and congressmen/women and senators) who is willing to stand up to Mexico and its civilian armies, then they deserve whatever they get (like the tourists visiting gangsterlandia south of the border) and they had better start arming lifeguards with AK-47s.
If American voters are unwilling to support the fight against illegal aliens, then it doesn’t matter who wins the election because America will have become a lost cause for everyone but those invading the country.
The Iraq War
The next president needs to get American troops out of Iraq because the Iraq war is bleeding America of American lives and of oceans of money, and because the war is unwinnable. Anyone who thinks the Iraqis are going to be friends of America after the war’s end (win—whatever that means—or lose) is an idiot. Eventually, Iraq will have a leader like Venezuelan President Hugo Chavez who will be more interested in serving his people than in being America’s friend. America could use such a leader, one not interested primarily in serving wealthy special interest groups but in serving the American people. Besides, almost all Iraqis have suffered harm as a result of the U.S. invasion of their homeland, and only a madman would think they will feel any loyalty toward us after the war.
The Homosexual Issue
Homosexuals are not a threat to America. I am not an advocate of their lifestyle and certainly don’t appreciate their influence upon Hollywood movies (such as Brokeback Mountain). However, the vast majority of American boys and girls do not want to be homosexuals. The biggest threat sexually to American values is the celebration of promiscuity in popular culture, not homosexuality. Mexican gangs and drug lords are a far greater threat to American communities than homosexuals are. Thus, I suggest that Republican presidential candidates take the position (a traditionally Republican position) that the states should decide how to handle the various issues regarding homosexuality, such as whether or not they should be able to marry. Personally, I could care less if they marry. If doing so is a sin, then let God punish them. Americans have other more pressing problems to worry about, such as water scarcity, deadly bacterial diseases killing young Americans inside and outside of high schools, spreading STDs, growing debt, a weakening dollar, a demoralized military, a weakening economy, skyrocketing gas prices, declining values of homes and increasing home foreclosures, etc.
Abortion
As with Homosexuality, let each state deal with the issue of abortion. It is an ugly issue and a dilemma at best. From a practical standpoint, I don’t want unprepared, uneducated, uninterested mothers raising children. Each child might be a blessing but only if it is brought up by caring, intelligent parents who have the wherewithal to care for the child properly, and not to use the child as a source of welfare income, which is exactly what many immigrants do through agencies such as Aid to Families with Dependent Children.
Protecting the Environment
An important issue, but again I would allow states, such as California, lead the way. However, the environmental change that is presently the greatest threat to America is demographic, the alienation of American society, which works out great for aliens, especially Mexicans, but is a disaster for Americans. In his book Gringo, Travis Barrett discusses the destruction of the America’s cultural ecology by the introduction of alien ecologies.
Universal Health-Care Coverage
Personally, I would be all for universal health-care coverage if it were not for the fact that I do not think the American government should be providing medical care (or any other social service) to people who entered the country illegally or to their children. If the democrats get into office, Americans can expect not only tens of millions of new Hispanic U.S. citizens, but also tens of billions of tax dollar to pay for their medical expensive. Of course, if the illegal aliens had to return home, the health care program might even be affordable.****
Kissing
Kissing was actually on the list of political issues that I consulted. I would say that if Americans vote for Hillary Clinton or any other candidate who does not have the cahones to stand up to the alien armies presently occupying America and to Mexico for its poorly kept secret war against the U.S., then Americans can expect their politicians to continue kissing the asses of illegal aliens and of those who sponsor them, which will mean very soon that Americans will be kissing America good-bye. And, by the way, expect the next alien invasion to come from Iraq—a little bad karma payback. Already in many American cities one can hear five times a day the Islamic calls to prayer, five times a day the sounds of a defeated America.
Perhaps the most important issue is the Direction for America. Democrats, many Republicans, businessmen, Catholics (and many other Christians) envision America’s becoming a multicultural society in which Americans will be just another alien minority by the end of this century. If America is to remain America and not a Hispanic Nation or simply a nation of strangers, then American voters must act now while they still are a majority. If they do not, their children can expect to live in an America not so different from what the surfers encountered on the beaches of Mexico. If that is what Americans decide to vote for, then they too will deserve the bad karma that will result. And if they think God will come to their rescue, then they need to take another look at the Iraq War, and perhaps another look a Genesis. By choosing unwisely, Adam and Eve also lost paradise.
*Another Hispanic propagandist and spokesperson is Linda Chavez, whose articles appear often in the San Diego Union-Tribune. In a recent article titled “Immigration Issue Can’t Save GOP” she basically argues that the Republicans ought to give up on the Mexican American War and wave the white flag of surrender before the millions of illegal immigrants currently invading and occupying cities across America, because, in her words, a “tough stand on immigration is a big loser with Hispanic voters, who are becoming a larger share of the electorate.” In other words, if you want votes, sell out America. She can count on most if not all Democratic politicians to do just that, and I expect the Republicans will come around to way of thinking because the two things they value most are money and votes. What this means for illegal immigrants is something they have known all along: crime does pay. Whose side is Chavez on? The immigrants’ side, of course. She is a buddy of Mexico’s most powerful ally in America, George W. Bush, who in 2001 nominated her for Secretary of Labor, but the nomination was withdrawn after it was revealed that she had allegedly given money to an illegal immigrant from Guatemala who lived in her home. (Is this an example of providing residential sanctuary to illegals?) She also was U.S. Expert to the U.N. Sub-commission on the Prevention of Discrimination and Protection of Minorities. You have to give Chavez her due: unlike many American politicians, she has remained faithful to her people.
**You might have heard about the new two-punch theory of how the dinosaurs were driven into extinction. First there was a series of volcanic eruptions that caused a greenhouse effect, which put stress on the environment, and then an asteroid tipped the environment into negative territory for the big creatures. Well, it seems that America is facing a similar situation. First, George Bush and his predecessors allowed the threat of illegal immigration to grow catastrophically, and now I am afraid that if Hillary or any of the other democratic candidates get into office the result will be similar to the asteroids upon the existence of the dinosaurs: America’s extinction.
*** It was only after America invaded Iraq did Iraq become a threat to America, killing thousands of American soldiers and draining the American treasury of hundreds of billions of dollars.
****There might even be fewer fires like the ones that recently ravaged Southern California. Today’s San Diego Union-Tribune contains a story about Steven Santos Robles Jr., who volunteered to helped battle one of last month's wildfires in San Diego County but who is also on parole for setting seven San Diego County wildfires that charred thousands of acres and destroyed about a dozen homes.
In his article “Still a Chance To Woo Hispanic Voters” Navarrette refers to the GOP “condemning itself to years in the electoral wilderness by alienating an influential constituency.” In other words, the Republican Party should get out of the electoral wilderness by selling out to that influential constituency the people who have been invading the country for the last half-century and who are more committed to Mexico and the political party of La Raza Unida than to America or to either of its major political parties.*
The reason Navarrette is appealing to Republican politicians is because America has already been sold out to the illegal aliens by the Democratic Party either for votes or their Marxist ideology (that Americans should surrender their nation to the world’s downtrodden multitudes). The only difference between the democratic candidates in the presidential election is how much they are willing to grovel for Hispanic votes. Ironically, it is a Republican who may have set the lowest standard of obsequiousness, and that would be Senator John McCain. Among the Democratic candidates Senator Hillary Clinton most deserves the Benedict Arnold Medal of Dishonor for, as Navarrette puts it, “aggressively going after the Hispanic vote by racking up the endorsements of seemingly every Latino officeholder from East Los Angeles to the South Bronx.” In other words, voting for Hillary is raising the white flag of surrender to Mexico and the armies of illegals encamped in hundreds of cites across America.** Of course, she has been greatly helped by her husband Bill, whose sense of loyalty was pretty much demonstrated by his affair with Monica.
As you probably already know, Benedict Arnold was an American Revolutionary general and traitor whose planned to surrender West Point to the British for 20,000 pounds. The Benedict Arnold Medal of Dishonor should be given to American politicians who contribute to the surrender of America to those armies of the night that have been marching northward from Mexico, Central America, and South America into America. Of course, this means that most if not all Democratic politicians, many Republican politicians, and certainly the President of the United State should receive this medal.
Actually, Navarrette isn’t interest in the Republicans winning the election but only in Hispanics winning the election. And this should not be held against him. He is, first and foremost, a Chicano (note the title of his book A Darker Shade of Crimson: Odyssey of a Harvard Chicano) and totally committed to his people, unlike many Anglo-American politicians, businessmen, and American Catholics who are in favor of giving sanctuary to illegal immigrants. However, the Republicans can win the election without surrendering to the illegals if they are willing to be, unlike their rabid leader President Bush, flexible on some key and difficult issues. Two candidates who could pull this off are Thomas G. Tancredo and Michael D. Huckabee. The strategy would be to appeal to Democratic and undecided American voters, rather than to Hispanics, because what many Americans are looking for is a president who is interested in saving America for Americans and not for Mexico or the Hispanic Coalition called the Hispanic Nation.
What these politicians would need to do is create a triage that distinguishes the most important election issues from secondary issues. Below, some of those issues are examined.
Illegal Immigration
First and foremost, they should stand up against the illegal aliens and require that they return home and apply to enter the United States legally. Mexico is the greatest threat to the integrity of America, not Iraq***, not Iran, and not the terrorists. If Americans lose the present Mexican-American War, they can expect that their country will soon become totally criminalized as Mexico has been for decades if not forever. A glimpse of America’s Hispanicized future can be seen in a recent San Diego Union-Tribune article titled “Troubling Signs in Baja.” It describes recent attacks upon Americans foolish enough to visit Mexico by “paramilitary-style criminals.” Pat Weber, owner of San Diego Surfing Academy in Carlsbad, watched while Mexican gunmen “sexually assaulted his girlfriend before stealing $10,000 worth of computers, video cameras, and other gear.” Welcome to the land of Su Casa Es Mi Case. And as always, Mexican law-enforcement officers cannot be trusted because there is a good chance that they are corrupt and linked to criminal groups. Hundreds of cities and communities in the U.S. have already been criminalized by illegal aliens and their offspring. If it were not for Hispanic immigrants, the jails and prisons in California would not be overflowing. If Americans do not have the gumption to elect a president (and congressmen/women and senators) who is willing to stand up to Mexico and its civilian armies, then they deserve whatever they get (like the tourists visiting gangsterlandia south of the border) and they had better start arming lifeguards with AK-47s.
If American voters are unwilling to support the fight against illegal aliens, then it doesn’t matter who wins the election because America will have become a lost cause for everyone but those invading the country.
The Iraq War
The next president needs to get American troops out of Iraq because the Iraq war is bleeding America of American lives and of oceans of money, and because the war is unwinnable. Anyone who thinks the Iraqis are going to be friends of America after the war’s end (win—whatever that means—or lose) is an idiot. Eventually, Iraq will have a leader like Venezuelan President Hugo Chavez who will be more interested in serving his people than in being America’s friend. America could use such a leader, one not interested primarily in serving wealthy special interest groups but in serving the American people. Besides, almost all Iraqis have suffered harm as a result of the U.S. invasion of their homeland, and only a madman would think they will feel any loyalty toward us after the war.
The Homosexual Issue
Homosexuals are not a threat to America. I am not an advocate of their lifestyle and certainly don’t appreciate their influence upon Hollywood movies (such as Brokeback Mountain). However, the vast majority of American boys and girls do not want to be homosexuals. The biggest threat sexually to American values is the celebration of promiscuity in popular culture, not homosexuality. Mexican gangs and drug lords are a far greater threat to American communities than homosexuals are. Thus, I suggest that Republican presidential candidates take the position (a traditionally Republican position) that the states should decide how to handle the various issues regarding homosexuality, such as whether or not they should be able to marry. Personally, I could care less if they marry. If doing so is a sin, then let God punish them. Americans have other more pressing problems to worry about, such as water scarcity, deadly bacterial diseases killing young Americans inside and outside of high schools, spreading STDs, growing debt, a weakening dollar, a demoralized military, a weakening economy, skyrocketing gas prices, declining values of homes and increasing home foreclosures, etc.
Abortion
As with Homosexuality, let each state deal with the issue of abortion. It is an ugly issue and a dilemma at best. From a practical standpoint, I don’t want unprepared, uneducated, uninterested mothers raising children. Each child might be a blessing but only if it is brought up by caring, intelligent parents who have the wherewithal to care for the child properly, and not to use the child as a source of welfare income, which is exactly what many immigrants do through agencies such as Aid to Families with Dependent Children.
Protecting the Environment
An important issue, but again I would allow states, such as California, lead the way. However, the environmental change that is presently the greatest threat to America is demographic, the alienation of American society, which works out great for aliens, especially Mexicans, but is a disaster for Americans. In his book Gringo, Travis Barrett discusses the destruction of the America’s cultural ecology by the introduction of alien ecologies.
Universal Health-Care Coverage
Personally, I would be all for universal health-care coverage if it were not for the fact that I do not think the American government should be providing medical care (or any other social service) to people who entered the country illegally or to their children. If the democrats get into office, Americans can expect not only tens of millions of new Hispanic U.S. citizens, but also tens of billions of tax dollar to pay for their medical expensive. Of course, if the illegal aliens had to return home, the health care program might even be affordable.****
Kissing
Kissing was actually on the list of political issues that I consulted. I would say that if Americans vote for Hillary Clinton or any other candidate who does not have the cahones to stand up to the alien armies presently occupying America and to Mexico for its poorly kept secret war against the U.S., then Americans can expect their politicians to continue kissing the asses of illegal aliens and of those who sponsor them, which will mean very soon that Americans will be kissing America good-bye. And, by the way, expect the next alien invasion to come from Iraq—a little bad karma payback. Already in many American cities one can hear five times a day the Islamic calls to prayer, five times a day the sounds of a defeated America.
Perhaps the most important issue is the Direction for America. Democrats, many Republicans, businessmen, Catholics (and many other Christians) envision America’s becoming a multicultural society in which Americans will be just another alien minority by the end of this century. If America is to remain America and not a Hispanic Nation or simply a nation of strangers, then American voters must act now while they still are a majority. If they do not, their children can expect to live in an America not so different from what the surfers encountered on the beaches of Mexico. If that is what Americans decide to vote for, then they too will deserve the bad karma that will result. And if they think God will come to their rescue, then they need to take another look at the Iraq War, and perhaps another look a Genesis. By choosing unwisely, Adam and Eve also lost paradise.
*Another Hispanic propagandist and spokesperson is Linda Chavez, whose articles appear often in the San Diego Union-Tribune. In a recent article titled “Immigration Issue Can’t Save GOP” she basically argues that the Republicans ought to give up on the Mexican American War and wave the white flag of surrender before the millions of illegal immigrants currently invading and occupying cities across America, because, in her words, a “tough stand on immigration is a big loser with Hispanic voters, who are becoming a larger share of the electorate.” In other words, if you want votes, sell out America. She can count on most if not all Democratic politicians to do just that, and I expect the Republicans will come around to way of thinking because the two things they value most are money and votes. What this means for illegal immigrants is something they have known all along: crime does pay. Whose side is Chavez on? The immigrants’ side, of course. She is a buddy of Mexico’s most powerful ally in America, George W. Bush, who in 2001 nominated her for Secretary of Labor, but the nomination was withdrawn after it was revealed that she had allegedly given money to an illegal immigrant from Guatemala who lived in her home. (Is this an example of providing residential sanctuary to illegals?) She also was U.S. Expert to the U.N. Sub-commission on the Prevention of Discrimination and Protection of Minorities. You have to give Chavez her due: unlike many American politicians, she has remained faithful to her people.
**You might have heard about the new two-punch theory of how the dinosaurs were driven into extinction. First there was a series of volcanic eruptions that caused a greenhouse effect, which put stress on the environment, and then an asteroid tipped the environment into negative territory for the big creatures. Well, it seems that America is facing a similar situation. First, George Bush and his predecessors allowed the threat of illegal immigration to grow catastrophically, and now I am afraid that if Hillary or any of the other democratic candidates get into office the result will be similar to the asteroids upon the existence of the dinosaurs: America’s extinction.
*** It was only after America invaded Iraq did Iraq become a threat to America, killing thousands of American soldiers and draining the American treasury of hundreds of billions of dollars.
****There might even be fewer fires like the ones that recently ravaged Southern California. Today’s San Diego Union-Tribune contains a story about Steven Santos Robles Jr., who volunteered to helped battle one of last month's wildfires in San Diego County but who is also on parole for setting seven San Diego County wildfires that charred thousands of acres and destroyed about a dozen homes.
Thursday, November 8, 2007
Illegals Destroying America with the Help of the Catholic Church
This is got to be the most depressing time for Americans for a number of reasons, two of which are the illegal Iraq War and illegal immigration (itself an undeclared war). The Iraq War is an exercise in futility, destroying thousands of American lives and eventually costing American taxpayers over a trillion dollars. The only Americans benefiting are the avaricious wealthy, the likes of Cheney and Bush, who see war as a business investment. The war is already lost because even if America won the war (whatever that might mean), Iraq will be no more a friend of the U.S. than it was under Saddam Hussein.
The other source of America’s melancholy is the Second Mexican-American War, which now looks unwinnable. Whereas the so-called Coalition of nations supporting U.S. in Iraq is a joke (Albania, Armenia, Australia, Azerbaijan, Bosnia-Herzegovina, Bulgaria, Czech Republic, Denmark, El Salvador, Estonia, Georgia, Kazakhstan, Latvia, Lithuania, Macedonia, Moldova, Mongolia, Poland, Romania, South Korea, and the United Kingdom), the Hispanic Coalition supporting the Mexican invasion of the U.S. is no laughing matter (Cuba and South and Central America, about a half-billion people).
The invaders do suffer a few hundred casualties each year, but hundreds of thousands successfully cross the border, set up bases of operation, establish enclaves, and appropriate communities, cities, and ultimately states, the chief goal being to establish a Hispanic Nation on American soil. So when I read about illegal immigrant invaders suffering injury or death while invading America, I feel no pity for them. Most recently in the news were illegals burned in the California fires and presently costing American taxpayers thousands of dollars each day. I have no more pity for them than I would have for someone who injured himself or herself trying to break into my home.
The Sunday San Diego Union-Tribune did a story on a Mexican woman burned in the fire and hospitalized at the UCSD burn center. Recently she died of her injuries. The woman and her husband had entered the U.S. illegally ten years ago and had four children, who are now U.S. citizens. (Will America ever learn that the children of illegals should not be American citizens?) The woman and her husband had been making a living in the U.S. by selling tamales, which means that American taxpayers have been footing the bill for the social services, such as schooling and medical care, received by the family. Of course, the news article was written as a sob story so that readers feel sorry for, rather than threatened by, these people. Apparently, the woman was crossing the border with her brother who was attempting to enter the country illegally. He too was hospitalized in the burn center.*
The extent of the threat of illegal immigration to America is found in the numbers of illegal immigrant invading the U.S. and the number of their offspring. The family just mentioned had been in the U.S. for ten years and already had four children, the youngest being 18 months. The mother was only twenty-nine years of age. There is every reason to believe that the couple planned on having more children.
Another illustration of the prolificacy of the Hispanic immigrants is to be found in an article on two new cardinals serving the border region. Francisco Robles and Archbishop Daniel DiNardo of the Galveston-Houston diocese. Comparing the families of the two men reveals the future of America and why America is being flooded Katrina-like by Mexicans. Daniel DiNardo, an American, has a twin sister and two other siblings. The San Diego Union-Tribune article said that Francisco Robles, a Mexican, was the third of 16 children. In the article DiNardo is quoted as saying “immigration from Mexico and Central America, Asia and Africa have doubled the membership of his diocese” and that the “Holy See is saying that the whole south and southwestern part of the United States...,obviously a major portion of which are the Hispanics, is a noteworthy and beautiful addition to the Catholic Church in the United State.” Who is this guy kidding? It is perfectly clear that he is no friend of America, but an ally of the illegal alien invaders.
Millions of illegal immigrants are being championed and protected by the Catholic Church. The blogger El Gabo Gringo wrote a blog titled Illegal Immigrants Still Hiding Behind Christ, in which he describes an illegal alien by the name of Elvira Arellano who was taking sanctuary in a Chicago church. El Gabo Gringo is sympathetic with Elvira’s plight because she has a child born illegally in the United States, but is a U.S. citizen, nonetheless. Nevertheless, he is also critical of Elvira’s criminal behavior, explaining that Elvira works the media for sympathy, and the church enhances her ploy by allowing her to hide behind the loving image of Christ and the welcoming words of God. This is a popular strategy among illegals, and the passage from the Bible they quote most often is from Leviticus:
“But the stranger that dwelleth with you shall be unto you as one born among you, and thou shalt love him as thyself; for ye were strangers in the land of Egypt. I am the LORD your God.” (19:34)
If Americans are going to apply this principle to the illegal Hispanic invasion of America, then logically they should welcome with love and open arms burglars who invade their homes during the night.** It is one thing to be nice to strangers (which does not include those who threaten the integrity of one’s culture and homeland) and another to welcome an invading army. Should Tibetans have welcomed the Chinese or Kuwaitis the armies of Hussein? And only fool would allow the fact that the Hispanic invaders are civilians to blind him or her to the political aims of the invaders (which is to transform America into a Hispanic Nation and to annex American territory they call Atzlan, which is defined as follows: “The American Southwest, specifically the territory of northern Mexico ceded to the United States by the Treaty of Guadalupe Hidalgo in 1848. The term is used especially by Chicano-rights activists” (Yahoo Education).
The role of the Catholic Church, and many protestant churches, is similar to that of the Greek’s Trojan Horse used by the Greeks to invade the city of Troy. The horse appeared to be a gift, but once allowed into the city, its occupants, Greek warriors, opened the gates that protected the city and allowed the Greek army to destroy the city. This is exactly what is happening to America today. At least the Trojans put up a fight. Unfortunately, American soldiers are bogged down in an unnecessary and futile conflict in Iraq, designed more to enrich war profiteers and protect Israel than to protect Americans.
Why, you might ask, would the Catholic Church be so interested in protecting illegal aliens? Because the aliens are Catholics and the Church needs to fill the pews vacated when it was discovered that the Catholic Church in America has been operating as a factory of sin run by black-robed pedophiles producing traumatized children. Let’s face it, even Satan would be above fondling children. So now the Catholic Church is making a deal with illegal aliens, sanctuary for membership, and betraying America as Judas betrayed Christ.
American Christians who serve the cause of illegal aliens are in fact aiding and abiding an enemy that is a greater threat to the U.S. than any other in American history. An example of this type of do-gooder (imagine your neighbor helping a burglar break into your home by providing him with a stepladder) is Rosemary Johnston, Board Member, Interfaith Coalition for Immigrant Rights and a contributor to the National Catholic Reporter. In a letter to the editor (San Diego Union-Tribune), she says that “it is a sad commentary on our community when medical personnel have to defend and explain their decision to treat any human being with life-threatening injuries.” What Ms Johnston overlooks is the big picture, which is that illegal aliens are costing American taxpayers billions of dollars, overburdening social services, and criminalizing communities.
Hispanic street gangs are only one example. “Street gangs have existed in the United States since the 1800s. But in the last few years, street gangs have grown more violent, more numerous and more widespread, from the big cities to rural areas. Many gang members are illegal immigrants, mostly from Latin America.” (Voice of America/VOA.com) And recently we read about the sentencing of Mexican drug lord Arellano Félix, who admitted moving hundreds of tons of cocaine and marijuana into the U.S., which he could not have done without the presence of Hispanic street gangs. In addition, his trial would “be one of the longest and costliest in San Diego history” (San Diego Union-Tribune)
In a Union-Tribune article by Sandi Dolbee, titled Immigration Issue, March Draw Faith-Based Backing, Ms. Johnston is quoted saying, “We believe our nation stands at a critical tipping point now.” She certainly right about that, just as the Titanic was at a tipping point just before it struck an iceberg. The iceberg threatening America is illegal immigration, and those who are collaborating to ensure the sinking of America into an alien sea are the American Catholic Church; American businessmen; and corrupt, self-serving American politicians. And with the help of the fifth-columnists working on the behalf of illegal immigrants, America’s future looks as bright as that of Troy.
And in spite of what those glassy-eyed Christian (or nonbelieving Marxist) liberals would have you believe, there is never going to be a great reconciliation in America between the members of the Hispanic Nation and Americans. The country is in the process of suffering a great divide, such as existed after the Civil War, but the one that exists today will never heal because it is not between Americans (Yankees and Southerners) but between the invaders and the invaded. America’s future shall be that of continuing resentment and mutual mistrust and increasing conflict, not unlike that existing between the invading Jews and invaded Palestinians of Israel.
So, perhaps America should give up Christianity altogether and become a Moslem nation, because at least Moslems are willing to fight to protect the integrity of their homeland.
*I do not wish to make light of the horrific events suffered by these two people. I wish they had not been injured, but I also will not pretend to have much pity for them because I believe that illegal immigration really is the greatest threat America has ever faced. Mexico, with its Coalition of Southern Nations, is very likely to accomplish what neither the Germans nor the Japanese could have accomplished during WWII.
**A Hispanic house-jacking is described in Travis Barrett’s novel STRANGERS.
The other source of America’s melancholy is the Second Mexican-American War, which now looks unwinnable. Whereas the so-called Coalition of nations supporting U.S. in Iraq is a joke (Albania, Armenia, Australia, Azerbaijan, Bosnia-Herzegovina, Bulgaria, Czech Republic, Denmark, El Salvador, Estonia, Georgia, Kazakhstan, Latvia, Lithuania, Macedonia, Moldova, Mongolia, Poland, Romania, South Korea, and the United Kingdom), the Hispanic Coalition supporting the Mexican invasion of the U.S. is no laughing matter (Cuba and South and Central America, about a half-billion people).
The invaders do suffer a few hundred casualties each year, but hundreds of thousands successfully cross the border, set up bases of operation, establish enclaves, and appropriate communities, cities, and ultimately states, the chief goal being to establish a Hispanic Nation on American soil. So when I read about illegal immigrant invaders suffering injury or death while invading America, I feel no pity for them. Most recently in the news were illegals burned in the California fires and presently costing American taxpayers thousands of dollars each day. I have no more pity for them than I would have for someone who injured himself or herself trying to break into my home.
The Sunday San Diego Union-Tribune did a story on a Mexican woman burned in the fire and hospitalized at the UCSD burn center. Recently she died of her injuries. The woman and her husband had entered the U.S. illegally ten years ago and had four children, who are now U.S. citizens. (Will America ever learn that the children of illegals should not be American citizens?) The woman and her husband had been making a living in the U.S. by selling tamales, which means that American taxpayers have been footing the bill for the social services, such as schooling and medical care, received by the family. Of course, the news article was written as a sob story so that readers feel sorry for, rather than threatened by, these people. Apparently, the woman was crossing the border with her brother who was attempting to enter the country illegally. He too was hospitalized in the burn center.*
The extent of the threat of illegal immigration to America is found in the numbers of illegal immigrant invading the U.S. and the number of their offspring. The family just mentioned had been in the U.S. for ten years and already had four children, the youngest being 18 months. The mother was only twenty-nine years of age. There is every reason to believe that the couple planned on having more children.
Another illustration of the prolificacy of the Hispanic immigrants is to be found in an article on two new cardinals serving the border region. Francisco Robles and Archbishop Daniel DiNardo of the Galveston-Houston diocese. Comparing the families of the two men reveals the future of America and why America is being flooded Katrina-like by Mexicans. Daniel DiNardo, an American, has a twin sister and two other siblings. The San Diego Union-Tribune article said that Francisco Robles, a Mexican, was the third of 16 children. In the article DiNardo is quoted as saying “immigration from Mexico and Central America, Asia and Africa have doubled the membership of his diocese” and that the “Holy See is saying that the whole south and southwestern part of the United States...,obviously a major portion of which are the Hispanics, is a noteworthy and beautiful addition to the Catholic Church in the United State.” Who is this guy kidding? It is perfectly clear that he is no friend of America, but an ally of the illegal alien invaders.
Millions of illegal immigrants are being championed and protected by the Catholic Church. The blogger El Gabo Gringo wrote a blog titled Illegal Immigrants Still Hiding Behind Christ, in which he describes an illegal alien by the name of Elvira Arellano who was taking sanctuary in a Chicago church. El Gabo Gringo is sympathetic with Elvira’s plight because she has a child born illegally in the United States, but is a U.S. citizen, nonetheless. Nevertheless, he is also critical of Elvira’s criminal behavior, explaining that Elvira works the media for sympathy, and the church enhances her ploy by allowing her to hide behind the loving image of Christ and the welcoming words of God. This is a popular strategy among illegals, and the passage from the Bible they quote most often is from Leviticus:
“But the stranger that dwelleth with you shall be unto you as one born among you, and thou shalt love him as thyself; for ye were strangers in the land of Egypt. I am the LORD your God.” (19:34)
If Americans are going to apply this principle to the illegal Hispanic invasion of America, then logically they should welcome with love and open arms burglars who invade their homes during the night.** It is one thing to be nice to strangers (which does not include those who threaten the integrity of one’s culture and homeland) and another to welcome an invading army. Should Tibetans have welcomed the Chinese or Kuwaitis the armies of Hussein? And only fool would allow the fact that the Hispanic invaders are civilians to blind him or her to the political aims of the invaders (which is to transform America into a Hispanic Nation and to annex American territory they call Atzlan, which is defined as follows: “The American Southwest, specifically the territory of northern Mexico ceded to the United States by the Treaty of Guadalupe Hidalgo in 1848. The term is used especially by Chicano-rights activists” (Yahoo Education).
The role of the Catholic Church, and many protestant churches, is similar to that of the Greek’s Trojan Horse used by the Greeks to invade the city of Troy. The horse appeared to be a gift, but once allowed into the city, its occupants, Greek warriors, opened the gates that protected the city and allowed the Greek army to destroy the city. This is exactly what is happening to America today. At least the Trojans put up a fight. Unfortunately, American soldiers are bogged down in an unnecessary and futile conflict in Iraq, designed more to enrich war profiteers and protect Israel than to protect Americans.
Why, you might ask, would the Catholic Church be so interested in protecting illegal aliens? Because the aliens are Catholics and the Church needs to fill the pews vacated when it was discovered that the Catholic Church in America has been operating as a factory of sin run by black-robed pedophiles producing traumatized children. Let’s face it, even Satan would be above fondling children. So now the Catholic Church is making a deal with illegal aliens, sanctuary for membership, and betraying America as Judas betrayed Christ.
American Christians who serve the cause of illegal aliens are in fact aiding and abiding an enemy that is a greater threat to the U.S. than any other in American history. An example of this type of do-gooder (imagine your neighbor helping a burglar break into your home by providing him with a stepladder) is Rosemary Johnston, Board Member, Interfaith Coalition for Immigrant Rights and a contributor to the National Catholic Reporter. In a letter to the editor (San Diego Union-Tribune), she says that “it is a sad commentary on our community when medical personnel have to defend and explain their decision to treat any human being with life-threatening injuries.” What Ms Johnston overlooks is the big picture, which is that illegal aliens are costing American taxpayers billions of dollars, overburdening social services, and criminalizing communities.
Hispanic street gangs are only one example. “Street gangs have existed in the United States since the 1800s. But in the last few years, street gangs have grown more violent, more numerous and more widespread, from the big cities to rural areas. Many gang members are illegal immigrants, mostly from Latin America.” (Voice of America/VOA.com) And recently we read about the sentencing of Mexican drug lord Arellano Félix, who admitted moving hundreds of tons of cocaine and marijuana into the U.S., which he could not have done without the presence of Hispanic street gangs. In addition, his trial would “be one of the longest and costliest in San Diego history” (San Diego Union-Tribune)
In a Union-Tribune article by Sandi Dolbee, titled Immigration Issue, March Draw Faith-Based Backing, Ms. Johnston is quoted saying, “We believe our nation stands at a critical tipping point now.” She certainly right about that, just as the Titanic was at a tipping point just before it struck an iceberg. The iceberg threatening America is illegal immigration, and those who are collaborating to ensure the sinking of America into an alien sea are the American Catholic Church; American businessmen; and corrupt, self-serving American politicians. And with the help of the fifth-columnists working on the behalf of illegal immigrants, America’s future looks as bright as that of Troy.
And in spite of what those glassy-eyed Christian (or nonbelieving Marxist) liberals would have you believe, there is never going to be a great reconciliation in America between the members of the Hispanic Nation and Americans. The country is in the process of suffering a great divide, such as existed after the Civil War, but the one that exists today will never heal because it is not between Americans (Yankees and Southerners) but between the invaders and the invaded. America’s future shall be that of continuing resentment and mutual mistrust and increasing conflict, not unlike that existing between the invading Jews and invaded Palestinians of Israel.
So, perhaps America should give up Christianity altogether and become a Moslem nation, because at least Moslems are willing to fight to protect the integrity of their homeland.
*I do not wish to make light of the horrific events suffered by these two people. I wish they had not been injured, but I also will not pretend to have much pity for them because I believe that illegal immigration really is the greatest threat America has ever faced. Mexico, with its Coalition of Southern Nations, is very likely to accomplish what neither the Germans nor the Japanese could have accomplished during WWII.
**A Hispanic house-jacking is described in Travis Barrett’s novel STRANGERS.
Thursday, November 1, 2007
Another Rat Abandons the Sinking USS Disaster
It looks like another fat rat has decided to abandon the sinking ship of state, the USS Disaster, captained by George Bush. This one is Karen Hughes, who was in charge of improving the U.S. image abroad, which she and the rest of Bush’s crew destroyed. She said improving the world’s image of the U.S. will be a “long-term challenge” that will outlast her. Her statement indicates the extent of the damage that the Bush administration has done to America’s reputation. In fact, repair cannot begin until Bush and all the rodents who follow him like a piece of smelly cheese are gone.
White House press secretary Dana Perino praised Hughes’s performance, showing just what an idiot the press secretary is. For one thing, Karen Hughes was a member of the White House Iraq Group, whose job it was to dupe the American people into believing invading Iraq was a good idea. It must be satisfying knowing that you follow in the footsteps of such great propagandists as Joseph Goebbels, whose job it was to convince the German people that going to war was a good idea. In addition, just as Goebbels vilified the Jews, Hughes organized a media campaign that vilified the Democratic governor of Texas, Ann Richards (a good Texan, thus a member of an endangered species). I wonder if the smell of sulfur follows Karen Hughes as it does her boss and her fellow henchman Karl Rove?
Ms Hughes may think she can slink back to Texas with a clear conscience, but like the monster she helped foist upon the American people, her hands are soaked with the blood of Iraqi civilians and American soldiers and will leave a trail wherever she goes. I suppose as long as she remains in the great, nefarious state of Texas she can feel good about going out in public, but anywhere else in the U.S. and the rest of the world she will be seen as a monster, Grendel Bush’s monster mother.
If you disagree, just take a few minutes to consider the present state of the nation, and while you are at it, consider what exactly Bush and his band of bandits have done for the American people. Consider Bush’s war in Iraq and how much it has cost in lives and tax dollars. I won’t ask you to consider its effect upon the nation’s reputation because it seems like Ms Hughes most Americans could care less about what the rest of the world thinks about them. But consider the problem of illegal immigration and how George Bush has been more of an ally of the illegal aliens than of the American people. Finally, consider what has happened to the price of oil since Bush has been president. The answer is that it has made obscene profits for the oil industry, thus for Bush’s family and friends, and made poorer nonwealthy Americans.
Goodbye Karen, and good riddance.
White House press secretary Dana Perino praised Hughes’s performance, showing just what an idiot the press secretary is. For one thing, Karen Hughes was a member of the White House Iraq Group, whose job it was to dupe the American people into believing invading Iraq was a good idea. It must be satisfying knowing that you follow in the footsteps of such great propagandists as Joseph Goebbels, whose job it was to convince the German people that going to war was a good idea. In addition, just as Goebbels vilified the Jews, Hughes organized a media campaign that vilified the Democratic governor of Texas, Ann Richards (a good Texan, thus a member of an endangered species). I wonder if the smell of sulfur follows Karen Hughes as it does her boss and her fellow henchman Karl Rove?
Ms Hughes may think she can slink back to Texas with a clear conscience, but like the monster she helped foist upon the American people, her hands are soaked with the blood of Iraqi civilians and American soldiers and will leave a trail wherever she goes. I suppose as long as she remains in the great, nefarious state of Texas she can feel good about going out in public, but anywhere else in the U.S. and the rest of the world she will be seen as a monster, Grendel Bush’s monster mother.
If you disagree, just take a few minutes to consider the present state of the nation, and while you are at it, consider what exactly Bush and his band of bandits have done for the American people. Consider Bush’s war in Iraq and how much it has cost in lives and tax dollars. I won’t ask you to consider its effect upon the nation’s reputation because it seems like Ms Hughes most Americans could care less about what the rest of the world thinks about them. But consider the problem of illegal immigration and how George Bush has been more of an ally of the illegal aliens than of the American people. Finally, consider what has happened to the price of oil since Bush has been president. The answer is that it has made obscene profits for the oil industry, thus for Bush’s family and friends, and made poorer nonwealthy Americans.
Goodbye Karen, and good riddance.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)