Jews and the Islamic State: The Unspeakable Relationship

"RT this: Hamas is ISIS ISIS is Hamas" tweeted Headquarters of the Israeli Prime Minister Führer Benjamin Netanyahu. Well, well, well. Let's take a closer look at what infamous religious clan ISIS should really be identified with, that is, the relationship between the Islamic black heads of the Islamic State and the Jewish yarmulkes.  First and foremost, the members of the Islamic State are believers in Judeo-Islam and Judeo-Islam is one of the Jews’ monster offspring, the other being Judeo-Christianity. In this regard, the Jews did a two up on Victor Frankenstein: They created three monsters.

What does that mean? It means all members of the Islamic and Christian faith are members of the Jewish faith, having been Judaized, brainwashed with a religious form of the Ebola virus that rots the brain. The Muslims hate Jews but that’s like their hating their parents. The Jews gave birth to them. The Abrahamic faiths—Judaism, Islam, and Christianity—are also an axis of evil, actually the granddaddy of evil axes. They all worship the God of hate, Yahweh. Do these people read the book that gave birth to their mania? The fanatics do, the bloody juicy parts and the parts about hating all the members of other faiths or no faith. These people they call infidels, the hated non-believers of the truth faith—yet each of the Abrahamic faiths claims the others are not true, even groups of their own faith are denounced as being misguided and deserving of death, which will come in Hell if not on Earth. How about all of them being misguided?

Religionofpeace.com tells us:

The Quran contains at least 109 verses that call Muslims to war with nonbelievers for the sake of Islamic rule.  Some are quite graphic, with commands to chop off heads [they’ve proven they love lopping heads] and fingers and kill infidels wherever they may be hiding.  Muslims who do not join the fight are called "hypocrites" and warned that Allah will send them to Hell if they do not join the slaughter.

“Soon shall We cast terror into the hearts of the Unbelievers,” Says the Koran. Muslims certainly do that. Where could have Muslims learned such a monstrous, uncivilized way of thinking? From their parents the Jews. What the Muslims want is what their monstrous religious brothers the Christians also want—to brainwash the entire world, which means the entire world would become brain dead—being able to use one’s brain in a rational rather than irrational manner.

So what did the parent of these two brothers, Islam Cain and Christian Cain, teach them? To hate and if possible kill anyone who is not of their faith. For the knuckle-dragging Jews who invaded Canaan, they were called pagans or gentiles: members of any non-Jewish religion. Here just a morsel of how their God taught them to think:

When you draw near to a city to fight against it, offer terms of peace to it. And if it responds to you peaceably and it opens to you, then all the people who are found in it shall do forced labor for you and shall serve you.

But if it makes no peace with you, but makes war against you, then you shall besiege it. And when the Lord your God gives it into your hand, you shall put all its males to the sword, but the women and the little ones, the livestock, and everything else in the city, all its spoil, you shall take as plunder for yourselves. And you shall enjoy the spoil of your enemies, which the Lord your God has given you.

Thus you shall do to all the cities that are very far from you, which are not cities of the nations here. But in the cities of these peoples that the Lord your God is giving you for an inheritance, you shall save alive nothing that breathes, but you shall devote them to complete destruction, the Hittites and the Amorites, the Canaanites and the Perizzites, the Hivites and the Jebusites, as the Lord your God has commanded, that they may not teach you to do according to all their abominable practices that they have done for their gods, and so you sin against the Lord your God. (Deuteronomy 20:10-18)

Notice that women and livestock fall into the same category. Let’s be clear about one thing, the Abrahamic faiths serve one and only one purpose: the masculine will to dominance. That’s it in a nutshell.

Interestingly, the next passage shows more compassion toward trees, fruit baring trees anyway. The rest can be chopped down. That’s one reason the areas that was contaminated by the Abrahamic faiths are deserts today. But the tree chopping is also a metaphor for what the Jewish faith does to the human mind, denudes it of reason and morality. Oh what about the Ten Commandments. Those are for how the Jews treat one another, not how they should treat the hated gentiles. They considered them a source of contamination. How ironic that Hitler thought the same about the Jews!

Is it any wonder that the Jews have been hated for all their existence? They began the hate game in God’s name. They have always considered themselves above everyone else. An attitude their two religiously demented, narcissistic offspring would continue. The God inspired arrogance is a Hebrew mental disease propagated by the teachings of the Hebrew God. Even when the Jews were powerless, they shunned everyone else because others were considered a source of contamination. An example is found in the Book of Ezra:

We have broken faith with our God and have married foreign women from the peoples of the land, but even now there is hope for Israel in spite of this. Therefore let us make a covenant with our God to put away all these wives and their children, according to the counsel of my lord and of those who tremble at the commandment of our God, and let it be done according to the Law. (Ezra 10)

So what’s going on? An abomination: sons of priests had taken filthy gentile women as wives and, MY GOD!, some even had dirty sex with them and produced GODFORSAKEN OFFSPRING! So what were these Jewish backsliders (those who love nonJews) to do? “All these [sons] had married foreign women, and they put them away with their children.” How were they put away? Sent out into the wilderness? We know what the Judaized black heads would do. Rape and kill the women and then bury them with their children.

What about the King of Jews—Jesus? He was a rabbi who preached love and openness. Yeah, and that got him killed by Jewish priestly politburo. Jesus’ sin was that he welcomed gentiles to Judaism, and the xenophobic traditionalists said no fucking way that we are going to invite those filthy, contaminated gentiles into our private club: “It’s bad enough that Jesus is welcoming tax collectors, prostitutes (in service to priests), and lepers. But gentiles, the devil’s own people! That’s too much. The Romans have to be convinced to put this wannabe savior out of our misery.”

But in reality, Jesus was not a loving rabbi, a contradiction of terms. Ernest Renan tells us in his must-read* The Life of Jesus that Jesus “was… totally outside nature: family, friendship, country, had no longer any meaning for him.”

*Of course, the book is off limits because it and most other books are the work of Satan.

The truth is Jesus welcomed only those people who would surrender their brains to him and become zombie followers of his brand of Judaism. Let’s take a look at what this world-loving savior Jew wanted:

“Do not think that I have come to bring peace to the earth. I have not come to bring peace, but a sword. For I have come to set a man against his father, and a daughter against her mother, and a daughter-in-law against her mother-in-law. And a person's enemies will be those of his own household. Whoever loves father or mother more than me is not worthy of me, and whoever loves son or daughter more than me is not worthy of me. And whoever does not take his cross and follow me is not worthy of me. Whoever finds his life will lose it, and whoever loses his life for my sake will find it.” (Matt. 10:3439)

No, these are not the words of the black head who murdered James Foley. But that’s how all the Judaized black heads think. They are the words of sweet Jesus. And after two thousands plus of Judeo-Christian inspired carnage, Jesus certainly accomplished his mission.

Let’s pick out another passage at random:

“I came to cast fire on the earth, and would that it were already kindled! I have a baptism to be baptized with, and how great is my distress until it is accomplished! Do you think that I have come to give peace on earth? No, I tell you, but rather division. For from now on in one house there will be five divided, three against two and two against three. They will be divided, father against son and son against father, mother against daughter and daughter against mother, mother-in-law against her daughter-in-law and daughter-in-law against mother-in-law.” (Luke 12:49-53)

Renan says that Jesus’ “enemies declared him to be possessed.” No shit! He was possessed all right, possess by the Hebrew religion. As Renan says, Jesus ceased to be a natural man. He hated the world except for his handful groupies the Apostles.

Let’s get down to the present business: with divine justification it is okay to brutally conquer other peoples and take their lands, towns, fields, and homes for oneself and slaughter the inhabitants along the way. (Women are slaughtered only after sexual abuse and torture or sold off to the sex industry, like Hollywood.)

Where did the black heads get the idea that God condoned such behavior? You guessed it: the diabolical Jews. Like their offspring the Christians and Muslims, Jews think that they have to right to mess with other people’s homelands. The Jews who invaded the U.S. after WWII have been doing it to America. And why didn’t they go to their Promise Land? Because there was more money in America and a military and Judaized politicians could be coopted into serving as Israel golem. (Remember George and Lennie in Of Mice and Men. Well, America is Israel dumb-ass, retarded (Judaized) Lennie.)

The land of milk and honey (today blood and guts) promised to the Jews by their imagined deity actually belonged to someone else, but the Jews could take it because their invented God said they could. How convenient! And divinely justified conquest is what we are witnessing today. Conquest has always been going on, but the Jews wanted to kill and confiscate with a clear conscience—because they are the best of the best. What did their God tell them?

On that day the Lord made a covenant with Abram, saying, “To your offspring I give this land, from the river of Egypt to the great river, the river Euphrates, the land of the Kenites, the Kenizzites, the Kadmonites,  the Hittites, the Perizzites, the Rephaim, the Amorites, the Canaanites, the Girgashites and the Jebusites.” (Genesis 15:18-12)

God says it was theirs and that’s all the permission they needed. And the black heads of the Islamic State have been following in their parent Judaism’s bloody footsteps. The Book of Joshua tells us in glorious fashion all about the slaughter:

Joshua "carries out a systematic campaign against the civilians of Canaan — men, women and children — that amounts to genocide." In doing this he is carrying out herem as commanded by Yahweh in Deuteronomy 20:17: "You shall not leave alive anything that breathes." The purpose is to drive out and dispossess the Canaanites, with the implication that there are to be no treaties with the enemy, no mercy, and no intermarriage. "The extermination of the nations glorifies Yahweh as a warrior and promotes Israel's claim to the land." (From Wikipedia.)

Wikipedia notes that other religiously possessed peoples did the same thing, but two wrongs don’t make a right. The important point is that the heinous Judaized offspring, Christian Cain and Islam Cain, would continue the same policy but on a much larger scale. The black heads are doing it today. The Judeo-Christians that slaughtered the heathen Native Americans did it not so long ago. The same bunch of fanatics did it to the Buddhist Vietnamese.

And déjà vu in 1948 the Jews repeated the conquest of Canaan in God’s name—by slaughtering the peoples of Palestine and expropriating their lands and homes for themselves. It was all justified because it was done in God’s name! (Obviously, any evil committed in God's name becomes a good deed. That is the logic of the religiously demented.) And by doing so the Jews proved Hitler right, that the Jews, like their religious offspring, are bad news.

What the Jews unleashed upon the world was a virulent Ebola form of religion that would spread across the globe trailing rivers of suffering, carnage, and blood in order to steal the homelands of the filthy pagans, gentiles, infidels, and other enemies of God. And given they all worship the God of Hate, this axis of evil trio even love hating and killing one another. The Holocaust was bad, but nothing compared the carnage and suffering spawned by the Jews’ demonic religion.

Russia's Invasion of Ukraine and the Justification for Terrorism

The Washington Post editorial board: "The United States now faces a naked act of armed aggression in the center of Europe by a Russian regime that is signaling its intent to steamroller this U.S. president and his allies. MR. OBAMA MUST DEMONSTRATE THAT CAN’T BE DONE."

Bullshit. It’s not armed aggression against the U.S. There is no reason that Obama must do anything at all, other than give the madman Putin a telephone call and try to reason with the embodiment of twisted, tyrannical reasoning beast of a human being. Yeah, I get that Putin is a diluted monster, but the world has been and is full of them, still is. Let’s keep in mind that the Ukraine has been ruled by such people before the invasion. And  that Obama has killed more people with his pet predator drones than Putin has in the Ukraine: more than 2,400 dead as Obama’s drone campaign marks five years, a lot more drone notches that demented Bush has. And as of now there are 6000 Russian troop is the Ukraine and as far as I know there are  still about 34,000 US troops in Afghanistan after ten years of war. And the Russians are the bad guys! J

Yeah, shit happens, but it’s none of our affair just because we have a big military. This is nothing more than a political chest-beating contest. Why should Americans care about Ukrainians? They are not our friends. As far as I know they have never done anything for us. It’s up to them to deal with the problem.

If Russians want to occupy the Ukraine then the Ukrainians can fight back just as the Afghan warriors fought back against the Russian occupation of their country and presently against the American occupation. Of course, the Soviets, as they were known at the time, had their Marxist agenda for rebuilding and managing the country. The U.S. has its own agenda as well. But neither has the right to impose its notion of the ideal nation upon another nation. Yeah, the Muslim Taliban are a strange and savage bunch, but that’s Islam. Actually, it’s any of the Abrahamic religions. The ancient Jews passed to the world a diabolical and vicious religion. Unfortunately, the New Testament came with the old, the new god with the old tyrannical Yahweh, the one who flooded the world.

Instead of the morons in Washington, along with the Bible-belt morons longing for Armageddon, getting us into World War III, let the Ukrainians do what the Vietnamese, Afghan, and Iraqi warriors did against bully America, fight, fight, fight. Make occupation a costly game for Pukin… ah Putin. Let them become a thorn  (many actually) in his and the Russian people’s side as the Chechens are. But the Chechens are terrorists. Yes, of course they are. What do you expect them to do against the Red Army… I mean Putin’s army? The ancient Jews were perhaps the first real terrorists. Their assassins made life miserable for Roman occupiers and for Hebrew collaborators. Modern Jews used terrorism against the British and Palestinians (still do for that matter but now they’re the occupying tyrants).

There are two important lessons that can be learned from the Jews's use of terrorism. The first is that terrorism is justified only against a powerful invading force occupying one’s homeland—such as in the case of the Romans occupying Judaea the ancient homeland of the Jews. The second is that terrorism is never justified to defend, promote, or impose an idea or ideology. Ideas being ideas should always be a matter of choice. Using violence or the threat of violence to impose an idea is a violent invasion of a person’s mental space, just as Putin’s invasion of Ukraine is an invasion of the homeland of the Ukrainian people—the land where they live their lives, the land where their dead are buried, the land in which their culture is rooted. Ideas don’t bleed, don’t suffer, don’t die, thus need not be imposed or defended violently, only rationally.

However, the Maccabean Jews did use a weird form of violence as a means to impose their religious ideology on others. In his book The Harvest of Hellenism, F.E. Peters states that the Maccabean leader John Hyrcanus engaged in forced conversion of Idumaeans to Judaism. The process involved compulsory circumcision. Later on, Hyrcanus’ son Judah offered the inhabitants of Galilee the choice of being circumcised or emigrating to a more religiously tolerant community among the pagans (286-287 & 291). Circumcision is a crude form of imposing an identity. It’s like branding cattle. 

The most subtle Jewish terrorist was Apostle Paul and perhaps even Jesus though probably not since Paul and the Gospel writers corrupted Jesus and his message. Paul didn’t use the physical threats of terrorism to get the pagans of the Roman Empire to convert to the new Judaism—Judeo-Christianity. He used the threat of burning in the fires of hell for an eternity. That’s a form of terrorism that terrifies the mind. Once the pagans became Judeo-Christians they would use both physical and psychological terror to convert remaining pagans to Judeo-Christianity. The Catholic Church would use both forms of terror. Ditto for Muhammad and Judeo-Islam.

What was the origin of using terrorism to get people believe a certain set of ideas (i.e., an ideology) and then to behave according to those ideas? The origin is the Jewish God Yahweh. He was the first to terrorize his chosen people to believe in only his religion (an ideology) and in no other religion. In the story of the Golden Calf he terrorizes Jews for worshiping a calf of their own making. So, it was assumed that if God can use terrorism to enforce his big idea, then people can do the same. But that means that the Jewish God was not omnibenevolent but omnimalevolent. Ergo, the use of terrorism against an invading or occupying oppressor such as Putin’s army is justified, but using terrorism to enforce the acceptance of an idea is immoral because ideas don’t bleed, suffer, or die but people do.

Terrorism is exactly what the Ukrainian freedom fighters must resort to if their military can’t protect their country, which it can’t. American Indians used terrorism to discourage Europeans and later Americans invading and occupying their homeland. Yeah, they killed men, women, and children, just as the long knives did. In other words, terrorism is a necessary evil. Who would gainsay that Ukrainians would be wrong to blow up a Russian theater filled with Russian men, women, and children if the Russian military occupies the Ukrainian homeland? I’m sorry, when a nation threatens your homeland and your own people, there are no rules. You do whatever you need to to destroy or dissuade the threat. Many American commentators have suggested dropping atomic bombs on Russia. Obviously, such an act would be an act of terror, and not very understandable because it’s not their call. It really is amazing how American nut cases believe they can speak on the behave of the rest of the world. Maybe the Ukrainians would rather do without a nuclear war on their behalf.

The U.S. used similar, though less destructive, acts during the Vietnam War and the wars in Afghanistan and Iraq. During World War II it did dropped atomic bombs on civilian targets to terrorize the Japanese people. Americans make a big deal of condemning terrorism but America has used terrorism (on an infinitely larger scale than used by al-Qaeda) since the beginning of the nation, which also began a very long period of Indian extermination. Serial killer Obama’s uses of predator drones are acts of terror. If an attack terrifies civilians, then it’s a terrorist act. Don’t give me this bullshit that it isn’t because terror wasn’t its intention.

Getting back to the Ukrainians, I think that we have to accept that they are going to have to pull their own weight in this situation, just as the Syrian rebels have against Putin’s monster friend al-Assad. That’s what they need to do. Yeah, if that means blowing up theaters and shopping mall, then so be it. Really, would anyone have objected to nuking Berlin, totally destroying it, if doing so would have prevented World War II and the Holocaust. The answer is no. Anyone who says otherwise is either a liar or too much a coward to admit the truth.

As much as the hypocritical U.S. Government condemns terrorism, even declaring war against it, it has used terrorism repeatedly and has to accept that the Ukrainian have the right to use terrorism against Russians as long as the Russian military is occupying their homeland. Terrorism is always an evil, but sometimes it’s a necessary evil. Wake up America, that’s the truth your actions have always shown but your self-serving rhetoric continues to deny.

The Roswell Shooting: The Unspoken Tragedy

A twelve-year old shot and wounded two other children about his age at Berrendo Middle School in Roswell, New Mexico. The national media made a really big deal out of the incident. So did the town’s people, who most likely knew their reaction would end up on television and Internet news, Internet social media, etc. Everyone would be getting their 15 minutes of fame. To look at the photos of people’s reaction, you’d think the town had just suffered a disastrous earthquake or a series of deadly car bombs like the liberated Iraqis do almost daily.

This sort of mass-hysteria response to sad but hardly horrific events has been common in the U.S. since the 9-11 attacks.  It’s truly a strange to see Roswelleans behaving as if the shooting is somehow similar to the horror experienced daily by Syrians. What happened was certainly dreadful for the parents of the children shot, but it was hardly a tragic event for the community as a whole.

However, Roswell and New Mexico have experienced an unspoken or unacknowledged tragedy.

Characters mentioned in one article covering the shooting: New Mexico Gov. Susana Martinez, Odiee Carranza, New Mexico State Police Chief Pete Kassetas, ... Hispanics make up the majority group (44%) of the population of Roswell, gringos Americans 27%. And among U.S. states New Mexico has the highest percentage of Hispanics (46%). “As of 2000, 8.2% of the residents of the state were foreign-born (Wikipedia),” most likely illegals or relatives brought in from Mexico and elsewhere via chain migration. Roswell barely qualifies as an American city and New Mexico barely qualifies as an American state.

City-Data.com rates Roswell high in crime. And News-sky.com said, “Roswell has been rocked by gang violence in recent years and has asked Homeland Security Investigations to step in and help.”

City-Rating.com says this about Roswell:

“The city violent crime rate for Roswell in 2010 was higher than the national violent crime rate average by 84.08% and the city property crime rate in Roswell was higher than the national property crime rate average by 67.3%.

“In 2010 the city violent crime rate in Roswell was higher than the violent crime rate in New Mexico by 26.18% and the city property crime rate in Roswell was higher than the property crime rate in New Mexico by 43.27%.”

One Internet commentator said of Roswell: “I live in Roswell, and I am looking to get out. For a town this small, it's nuts how high crime is... I love NM [New Mexico] for a lot of reasons, and when I didn't have kids, it didn't bother me much, but now we have real misgivings about sending out kids to HS [high school] here…  I would NEVER recommend moving here.”

He’s right New Mexico used to be a terrific place to visit or live. Same goes for Roswell. That’s no longer true.

Madeleine Carey compares her hometown Albuquerque to the crime show Breaking Bad:

“Breaking Bad has given me a way to explain Albuquerque without saying a word. It’s a place where we struggle with drug epidemics, extreme drought, hunger, drunk driving, gun violence (New Mexico’s gun-death rate is 40% higher than the national average), and a corrupt police force. Nearly 20% of the population lives below the poverty line, and the crime rate is 53% higher than the national average. Albuquerque is a city plagued by mediocrity — a drying river, a losing football team (the University of New Mexico Lobos), a dearth of ambition. But it also gets under your skin and into your blood, like a drug you won’t forget and can’t explain. It will always be my home, even if I am far away.”

I wonder if she will remain “far away.” I suppose one would enjoy living in Albuquerque if one wants to live in a world that’s a lot like that in the video game Grand Theft Auto: “Of the 111 Albuquerque gangs, 61 are Hispanic, 31 black, and 19 white.”

Here’s a video on the gang problem in Albuquerque:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iKaPTns5dqE

What the politically correct video doesn’t mention is the Hispanic factors. Hispanics who have ruined communities in California, in particular, L.A., have been immigrating to New Mexico. In other words, it’s a Hispanic issue. And most of the Hispanics are illegals or the offspring of Hispanics who entered the U.S. illegally.

Take a longer look:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uFGvPnvhXUU

About Hispanic gangs taking over the country, Dave Gibson says,

“At one time, violent crimes attributed to Mexican and Central American gangs were largely confined to Los Angeles. However, just as illegal aliens have spread across this country, so too has a veritable crime wave. We are now experiencing the early stages of the most violent gang epidemic we have ever seen.” (http://www.examiner.com/article/latin-american-gangs-are-taking-over-our-streets)

This is what happens when Hispanics take over an American state or city, turning it into a non-American barrio crime zone. They are also become dead-beat communities that live, one way or another, off the largess government jobs and welfare. The emotional tone of these multicultural communities is a mixture of hostility, aggression, fear, anger, suspicion, resentment, and violence.

Of course the focus of the Roswell shooting will be on gringo Mason Campbell, and the real tragedy that has tragedy of Roswell and New Mexico will be left unacknowledged. And if Mason ends up in a corrections facility, he will find a lot more Hispanics than gringos. In 1996 the prison population consisted of 56.30% Hispanic and 27.25% gringos. (Of course, blacks do their part, 12.24%, even though they make up only 2% of the population.)  (http://isr.unm.edu/reports/1996/WhoInPrison.pdf )

The report dated but if there has been any change, it’s most likely that the Hispanic prison population has grown to match the increase of Hispanics in the state. Here a look at what the Hispanics have given New Mexico:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=f8WGoy0QM8Q

And continue to give the entire country:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Z9XjdY7JIoU 

Imagine the cost of dealing with Hispanic gangsters and their threat to Americans. And our dumbass government worries about the Taliban and al-Qaida. Of course, fighting wars is always profitable to those who work for the military-industrial complex, especially for the war profiteers, though costly to taxpayers who have been losing both their money and their homeland.