Selections
from Frank Kyle’s Gringo Unabridged
“I think America will become a divided nation. Half the country will be well off and happy enough but the other half will be struggling and very unhappy, and very angry. I will tell you one thing, Osama bin Laden is a fucking genius. He waited until we had a retard in the White House before striking. He must have known that with idiot Bush in office the country would collapse from its own weight, just like the World Trade Towers. Now it’s like worrying about whether or not there are enough lifeboats on board after the ship has struck the iceberg and is half underwater, the skipper still trying to put on his pants and shoes. It’s too late. Too late. Too late. Just like it’s too late for me.”
George Bush was never a match for Osama bin Laden because George Bush is a phony, and Osama bin Laden is the real thing. He is a real soldier, a true believer who lives the life of poverty that we expect of a spiritual leader. He is a man who fights for his people and their homeland rather than for personal gain. He is a man who without a nation, without a military, without great material resources, took on and defeated the United States.*
He will be
remembered as one of greatest leaders of 21st century (thus far, the greatest leader**). George, on the other hand, will
stand out as the 21st century’s greatest incompetent, a man who had
the opportunity and the power to accomplish unimaginable good for his people
and the world, but instead squandered both for a personal agenda of cultic
Christianity, Zionism, oil, wealth, cronyism, and the will to political power.
*If you haven’t noticed that we have
been defeated it’s because you have so little imagination. When you think defeat, you imagine only military
defeat. Think again. The United States defeated Iraq’s military and now
occupies the country, so the Iraqis are defeated and we are the victors. But
no, we were defeated when our soldiers first stepped upon Iraqi soil, and we
continue to be defeated each day we remain. And who lured the U.S. into Iraq?
Osama bin Laden, because he knew that
after 9-11 the U.S. would do
something irrevocably stupid because he knew
that political extremists like himself but not as intelligent occupied the
White House and political fools occupied the Senate and House of
Representatives.
If you want to
see defeat, America, look in the mirror. What you will see is a nation that is
disgraced; morally, politically, and financially bankrupt; bogged down in
unwinnable wars; invaded by alien hordes; and confused, conflicted, corrupt,
despairing, and demoralized. Instead of being a nation of leaders, we’ve become
a people led by fools, which makes us fools since we elected them. We have been
defeated and will not recover.
In other
words, the greatness of Osama bin Laden is that he understood that he didn’t
have to defeat America but only create a situation in which America would
defeat itself.
**Do the math.
1 George Bush + 1 Tony Blair + 1 John Howard + 1 José Maria Aznar + 1 Silvio
Berlusconi + all the other Bushian lap-dog leaders of the Coalition nations who
acted against the will of their people = 0. You ask how 1 = 0 is possible. A
politician who stands against his people, ignores reason, and acts immorally is
nothing. You may recall that evil is nothing in-itself, but only the absence of
good, an argument used to get God off the hook of having created or allowing
evil to exist in the world. I will let neither God nor these evil men off the
hook, but in the case of these evil men, they are nothing, less than the ash of
the burnt homes, villages, cities, and bodies they have caused to be destroyed.
Yet, 1 Osama
bin Laden = 1. Why? Because he and a handful of followers struck a blow against
the monstrous imperialistic dragon that seeks to control and transform the
world: America. He is the knight of old who serves not himself but his village
and his people. Americans cannot see Osama bin Laden as a hero because they do
not see their own villainy. They do not see that America has become like one of
the Humvees that drive through the streets of Baghdad shooting up the town and
intimidating the people. But like the lone protester who stood before the line
of tanks in Tiananmen Square, Osama bin Laden and a handful of his followers
stood up to America. Now millions do. Imagine 1 leader x 100 x 1000, x 10,000
followers and you will understand what has occurred under the reign of George
W. Bush. And these millions are willing to follow Osama bin Laden to the grave,
and will continue to do so long after he is dead. And why? I will say it again,
unlike the other so-called leaders, Osama bin Laden is supported by his people
because he represents them, he fights for them, and in their eyes he serve the
good by fighting against the evil empire. And who follows George Bush? A ragtag
crew of the possessed, either by God or Greed.
Thus I predict
that by the end of this century, Osama bin Laden will be worshipped by hundreds
of millions of followers because he stood up to the New Rome. I will even
venture that he will rival Jesus, who was unwilling to stand up against Rome
(“Render unto Caesar the things which are Caesar’s and unto God the things that
are God’s” [Mark 12:17]), who chose to surrender rather than
fight.† The present-day American politicians
and their motley crews of foreign sycophants will be remembered, like a bad
dream that cannot be forgotten, as the self-serving fools who led America and
the West to their ruin during the final years of their decline, just as the
corrupt Catholic priests will have struck the deathblow against a decrepit
Catholic Church.
†Of course, in the hands of Apostle Paul Jesus would
become the sword that would destroy the Roman Empire. The strategies of Paul
and bin Laden have similarities. Both men relied on psychology as their main
weapon. Neither believed the enemy could be destroyed militarily. Bin Laden has
always known that the Muslim freedom fighters can’t defeat the U.S. military,
but he knew he could cause it to defeat America by turning it against America.
That sounds paradoxical. But the American military has helped destroy America
in various ways. Money spent on it and its wars abroad is money that
financially drains American taxpayers but does nothing to improve the
functionality of their nation. And by focusing on the so-called threat abroad,
Americans have neglected various threats under their noses, such as a growing
hostile Hispanic Nation that is taking over America communities and acquiring
greater political clout to accomplish its own mission to take control of much
of America, especially the territories America stole from Mexico (the Aztlán Movement). But Americans’ militaristic mindset has also
resulted in the continuing deterioration of the nation’s infrastructure,
cities, primary and secondary education, social services such as care for the
elderly and public transportation, and economy.
In addition, America’s reckless use of the military has destroyed even among its allies its reputation as a nation motivated by ethical ideals. But there is something else about America that is unhealthy and frightening. Because of the 9-11 attacks Americans have come to celebrate militarism, so much so that it has deeply changed the culture. We have become like the ancient Spartans. The military defines our values and self-image. Culturally Sparta had nothing to offer the ancient world except its fighting prowess. It was Athens that was the intellectual and artistic center of the ancient world. It, not Sparta, represented a culture that could inspire future civilizations. America has become a nation of consumption, gadgets, entertainment, and militarism....
* * *
Toxic Aliens
Osama bin Laden made it clear that
Muslims are no different from infidels when it comes to wanting a homeland free
of unwanted aliens. He gave the presence of U.S. forces in Saudi Arabia as one
of the reasons for the 9-11 terrorist attacks. Islam forbids infidels from
desecrating Muslim soil. The interesting idea is what desecration implies about
how infidels are viewed: to Allah they are a form of pollution. This requires
no action on their part. They are inherently toxic to anything associated with
Islam. This idea originated with the ancient Jews and their belief that pagans
were an abomination to Yahweh. We need only recall what Ezra tells the Jews:
“Separate yourselves from the people of the land, and from the strange wives”
[10:11]. Why? Because to Yahweh they were an abomination.
Replace Yahweh with Allah and you have the Islamic view of “the people of the land”: non-Muslims, that is, infidels or kafirs. However, for centuries Muslims were the toxic alien invaders. Arab Muslim conquests were in reality a centuries-long pogrom of violating other peoples’ homelands and cultures. Muslims are like the thief who is outraged that property he stole is stolen from him. The process of Muslims’ violating (by colonization, appropriation, and ethnic cleansing) other peoples’ homelands began when Muhammad and his army appropriated Mecca from its pagan inhabitants, cleansed the city of its pagan religions, and converted the populous to Islam.
Cultural
Preservation Is Justified
Yet, I tend to agree with the idea
that the people of each nation have a right to preserve their homeland from
foreign invasion and corruption (even if that means only alteration or
mutation). I suspect that what the ancient Jews feared as much as defilement
was dissolution. They existed in a sea of pagans whose often appealing cultures
could absorb the Jewish people and by doing so make them disappear—as so many
tribal cultures have been absorbed by larger, more sophisticated cultures. One
strategy adopted by the Jews to prevent this was to declare the pagans the
enemies of God. The reason the ancient Jews sought a homeland was to be able to
root their culture in that which is tangible, stable, and enduring. A people’s
homeland is a bulwark that protects and enables the preservation of a people’s
culture, the matrix that defines who they are.
It is simply a matter of preserving
the homeland of one’s people in order to preserve the culture that gives a
people their identity. That can’t happen if the homeland is overrun by aliens
whose cultures are incompatible with those of the resident culture. What
Jefferson demanded of the Indians is instructive. He demanded that the native
peoples adopt the ways of the invaders. That is different from a resident
culture’s demanding invaders to adopt the resident culture: its beliefs,
values, attitudes, morals, language, knowledge, education, history, dress, law
and government, etc. The former is morally unjustified; the latter isn’t. Why?
Because invaders have no moral authority to demand anything of the people whose
homeland they have invaded.
Perhaps what most inflamed Hitler’s hatred of the Jews was that after World War I many of the Bolsheviks seeking a Marxist revolution in Germany were Jewish. Thus he considered Jews a threat to the Germanism of Germany. One example is the Spartacus League which was a Marxist revolutionary movement organized in Germany during World War I. Rosa Luxemburg, Paul Levi, and Leo Jogiches were prominent Jewish members. But even the non-Jewish members of the movement were Marxist. Hitler witnessed the Marxist destruction and cultural cleansing of Russia, which became the Union of Soviet Socialist Republics. Cultural-ethnic cleansing has been the intended goal of the four most influential Jewish ideologies: Judaism, JudeoChristianity, JudeoIslam, and Marxism. All four of these ideological programs have engaged in the violent cultural destruction of the countless homelands they invaded.
* * *
George W. Bush’s
Iraq War
And then our president creates the most successful terrorist training camp in the world—Baghdad, Iraq, a camp operated by the American military from the Green Zone. The city itself is used to provide a real-world urban fighting environment, and American soldiers and Iraqi civilians are provided as live targets for the terrorists to ambush, kidnap, torture, shoot, and blow up. The entire operation is funded by the American taxpayer, and the success has been phenomenal. Before Camp Baghdad was activated, there were only a few thousand elite terrorist fighters in the world; now there are tens of thousands. And George Bush and his crew deserve all the credit. Well, not all the credit. There is also that genius Osama bin Laden, the project’s mastermind.
Who
Is Really Responsible for the Americans Killed in Iraq?
Or is it fair that the U.S. Government places a $25,000,000 bounty on Osama bin Laden’s head, who was responsible for killing 3,000 Americans; a $25,000,000 bounty on Saddam Hussein’s head and a $15,000,000 bounty on each of the heads of his sons, none of whom had anything to do with the 9-11 attacks; yet no bounty is placed on the heads of President George W. Bush, Vice President Dick Cheney, and Defense Secretary Donald H. Rumsfeld, who are responsible for the killing and maiming tens of thousands of Iraqis and thousands of American soldiers? The blood they have spilled would form a lake, and God knows that the bloody karma they have caused by the global disturbance they have created will continue to spread into the future for decades to come, like an endless hurricane that rains razor blades instead of drops of water and whose spiral arms cut like scimitars. And yet, these men shall retire in luxury, play golf, eat steak, and feel good about themselves. Truly a world that allows such injustice is vanity and its creator a laughingstock.
