Kamala’s Burden
In John Bunyan’s story Pilgrim's Progress the character Christian is weighed down by a great burden—the knowledge of his sin, which threatened to sink him into Hell. Kamala Harris is weighed down by a great burden that will prevent her from winning the presidential election against Donald Trump. One of the interesting aspects of recent presidential elections is voters voting against candidates rather than for candidates. For example, in the Biden-Trump election sufficient voters voted for Biden not because they liked or admired Biden but because they despised Trump. Trump won the election against Hillary Clinton because enough voters despised Clinton, rather than liked or admired Trump. The voting against rather than for scenario will be repeated in the present election.
Onward, Christian Soldiers
Trump’s political base is militant Christians. That is why he chose the militant Christian JD Vance as his running mate. Vance said that “Augustine gave me a way to understand Christian faith in a strongly intellectual way” (“JD Vance,” Wikipedia). He could have said “in a strong militant way” since Augustine is one of the most viciously militant theologians of all time. Augustine became a “severe and aggressive figure of authority.” In his Augustine of Hippo, Peter Brown says Augustine justified forced conversion (231). Charles Freeman says in The Closing of the Western Mind that “Augustine “provided rationale for persecution.... By the thirteenth century a papal legate reported on the extermination of the Cathars, a [Christian] sect which preached a return to the ascetic ideas of early Christianity: ‘Nearly twenty thousand of the citizens were put to the sword regardless of age and sex. The workings of divine vengeance have been wondrous’” (296). The new Cathars are the Democrats.
Brown tells us that Augustine spent “his middle age in a bitter campaign against fellow-Christians, the Donatist schismatics” (202). In addition, Freeman says that “Augustine’s rationale for persecution was to be used to justify slaughter (as of the Cathars or the native people of America)” (299). Brown also tells us that Augustine “wrote the only justification, in the history of the Early Church, of the right of the state to suppress non-Catholics,” which would include not only Protestants and Christian heretics but also members of other religions and atheists. Augustine believed that “paganism must be openly refuted.” Thus, he committed “himself to this task with the vast labour of his City of God” (Brown 269). As a result, Christians could slaughter Native Americans and take their land with a clear conscience. In the Old Testament God's chosen people set the set precedence doing so (with God's blessing) against Canaanite pagans and laid the foundation for militant Old Testament Christianity represented by Vance. About slavery, Augustine asserted “that slavery is God’s punishment for evil.” He wrote that it “can only be by a judgment of God, in whom there is no unrighteousness, and who knows how to assign divers punishments according to the desert of the sinners” (Freeman 206). Thus, black slaves were more evil than their owners and slavers were simply doing God’s work!
Vance aggressed Kamala by calling her a “cat lady” because she has no biological children, only step-children. It was an ad hominem attack condemning women who are infertile and demeaning the role of stepmother. Instead of being a follower of Augustine’s Old Testament Christianity, he should have paid closer attention to the behavior of Jesus and the doctrine of Apostle Paul. Jesus defended women rather than aggress them. Apostle Paul advised against both marriage and having children because he believed the Rapture was about to occur. And it is odd that Vance would criticize a Kamala for being infertile when Jesus and Paul both chose not to be parents. So clearly it is neither irresponsible nor unethical to choose not to have children. Apparently, Vance didn’t learn much philosophy even though he studied it.
Brown provides a Freudian explanation for the similarity of Vance and Augustine' thinking and behavior. Both had similar childhoods. "Vance has written that his childhood was marked by poverty and abuse, and that his mother struggled with drug addiction" ("JD Vance," Wikipedia). And "Augustine was the son of a violent father, and of a relentless mother; [thus] he could uphold what he considered objective truth with a notable innocence of his own aggressiveness" (Brown 208).
When Is Enough Enough?
Overpopulation is a good reason to have a pet cat rather than a child. With a global population of 8.3 billion, the Earth is overburdened with humanity. The population of the U.S. is one-third of a billion, ranking third after China and India. When I was in high school (1960s) the global population was three billion. At the time the U.S. population was 179.3 million and nineteen out of every twenty persons in the United States was born in America. Today, 13.8 percent of the nation's residents are foreign-born. And over a billion people live south of the American border who yearn to be in America as their populations increase and their quality of life decreases.
Finally, by serving as a step-mother Kamala behaves as a Good Samaritan. In sum, both Trump and Vance coming across as bullies improves Kamala's chance of being elected, but not enough.
Why JD?
Because appearances count a lot in politics. Images and facts are constantly manipulated to fit a political narrative. Vance comes across as all-American. Son of American born parents he overcame the hardships of a dysfunctional family, joined the Marines, used the G.I. Bill to go to college, and became a senator. Kamala Harris, on the other hand, is the child of Indian and Jamaican immigrant parents. She had a comfortable upbringing. She is called an African American, but the label is incorrect for two reasons: her father is Jamaican and she has no ancestors who were slaves on American plantations. Thus, she does not represent the suffering of black Americans. So, on the one hand we have Vance as a genuine American rooted in family and history and Kamala an American sanctioned by law. That is part of the great burden that puts her at a disadvantage against Trump and Vance. In addition, “Harris expressed support for San Francisco's sanctuary city policy of not inquiring about immigration status in the process of a criminal investigation” (“Kamala Harris,” Wikipedia). And as Border Czar, Kamala failed to secure the United States border, rather choosing to support Biden’s no border policy. So whose side is she on? And now two assassination attempts on the life of Donald Trump. It seems the Democratic Party she serves has become militarized.
Now her burden gets really heavy. She said she supported the violent “protests” that destroyed monuments, set fires in cities, destroyed businesses, and terrified citizens. She also supported all of Biden’s mismanagement, such as when he stumbled first day in office in January 2021 by despotically shutting down Keystone XL Pipeline without consideration for the American workers, costing the U.S. economy 59,000 jobs and $9.6 billion in economic growth. First day in office Walter Mitty Biden was going to show the Republicans who was boss. He showed them again with his despotic and bungled withdrawal from Afghanistan that led to the death of 13 U.S. service members. And nurse Kamala simply smiled. But Joe’s bungling arrogance became part of her legacy.
Say it ain't so, Joe.
NPR tells us that “Sen. Joe Biden was one of the few Democrats who sided with credit-card companies that were trying to make it harder for people to declare bankruptcy.” The bankruptcies were often caused by people having to use credit cards to pay medical bills, universal health care being absent. There’s more. SHRM (Society for Human Resource Management) says, “Newly sworn-in President Joe Biden unveiled legislation Jan. 20 that would create a pathway to citizenship for the roughly 10 million to 12 million undocumented immigrants living in the United States, offering expedited green card eligibility to ‘Dreamers.’” Taken together, it seems that Biden cared a lot more about the welfare of immigrants than he did about the welfare of Americans or about preserving the integrity of their homeland. Or did he open the border just to get back at Trump? Whatever their political motivation, both he and Kamala appear more committed to rioters and immigrants than to Americans. The slogan of the anti-American left at the time was “No borders, no walls, no USA at all.” Unbridled immigration could achieve that goal.
The Hidden Agenda
Old man Biden was played by the radicalized left that took control of the Democratic Party. His ego was stroked: “We will fulfill your wish to be PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES if you play along.” He said “I’m your man.” Of course he was. This was his last chance for greatness. The strategy was simple. The narcissistic old white man (much like Trump) would serve as the radical left’s Trojan horse. The goal wasn’t about policy but about revolution. If Biden gave up the ghost while in office, then Kamala would become president, the daughter of immigrants who had represented not traditional Americans but immigrants pouring across the border and being transported to cities across America, traveling expenses paid for by American taxpayers. In a sense, immigrants became the new proletariat with traditional Americans becoming the oppressive, racist, exploitative fascists. This Marxist revolution had been brewing in the U.S. for decades as explained in the following books and articles:
Clinton Rossiter’s Marxism: the View from America
Nathan Glazer’s The Social Basis of American Communism
Paul Buhle’s Marxism in the United States
Maurice Isserman’s “When New York City Was the Capital of American Communism” https://www.nytimes.com/2017/10/20/opinion/new-york-american-communism.html
Frank Kyle’s “The Roots of the Biden-Harris Marxist Overthrow of America”: https://speakingaboutnothing.blogspot.com/2021/09/the-roots-of-biden-harris-marxist.html
Most Americans are unaware of the influence of Marxist ideology in the U.S., and since the inept, heavy-handed overreaching of the Army–McCarthy hearings, criticism of those committed to the ideology is considered unjust and persecutory.
The Great American Multicultural Experiment
Normally, two methods have been used when political parties want to change the country. One is violence as used in Russia and China and attempted on a smaller scale in the U.S. The other is to change opponents’ thinking via dialogue and ratiocination. The latter hasn’t worked all that well in America because there are only two political parties and both are powerful political machines. In addition, differences are deeply rooted in ideology (Christianity, capitalism, and Marxism) and infused with hatred of the other party. In other words, emotion has overthrown reason. A new strategy was needed.
Whereas Republicans like George Bush Jr. tolerated illegal immigration for political/economic reasons, the new Democratic Party has been using it as a method for bringing about a demographic shift in the country. A five percent margin was all they needed. However, as noted above, something more radical has occurred within the Democratic Party. Why settle for a five percent margin when a demographic shift would keep the party in power forever, accomplished by transforming America into a multicultural society by importing tired, poor, wretched refused huddled masses yearning to escape their lawless, politically corrupt, poverty-ridden nations by emigrating to America.
Achieving a Leftist Utopia through Demographic Manipulation
The goal has been to marginalize traditional Americans as a political force nationally and in cities by changing the demographics—which has already occurred in many cities and states. The political objective has been to marginalize the political influence of traditional conservative Americans. The hidden agenda is to minoritize traditional Americans using population manipulation. Euphemistically, the project has been acclaimed as the Great American Humanitarian Multicultural Experiment that would result in a multicultural utopia in the way communism was supposed to create communist utopias. And yes, the multicultural experiment is a Marxist offshoot with all cultures and ethnic groups becoming politically, economically, and culturally equal. Of course, the multicultural experiment is contrary to the idea E Pluribus Unum (out of many, one) because it discarded the melting pot idea that all the cultures would come together to create a common, unified American culture. To the contrary, the differences of culture, ethnicity, and ideology that made up the multicultural puzzle have prevented the pieces from fitting harmoniously together. And traditional Americans—black and white—find themselves possessing no greater status than the new people flooding into the country. So, they feel they have been betrayed from within.
Biden’s Problem
Acquiring great power and influence usually does not result in being loved and appreciated, yet what Biden has wanted most is to be loved and appreciated, and to be given great man status—like that of Washington, FDR, Truman, Eisenhower, Lincoln, and well that’s just about it. Anyway, Biden’s problem is that he achieved his political ambition to become president, but he believes he has not been adequately loved and appreciated by Americans, not even by Democrats who simply used him as a tool. It was pretty clear that he is the Democrats’ puppet president. They knew his ambition was not their agenda but personal and narcissistic. Like Trump and most other politicians he has been driven by personal ambition—not the well-being of Americans. Being vilified by conservative and patriotic Americans and especially by his nemesis Donald Trump angered him. Welcome to my world, thought Trump. It was time for anti-American/anti-Trump payback. Biden halted work on Trump’s border wall (another one of 17 executive orders issued on his first day in office, including six others dealing with immigration), abruptly and authoritatively, without consensus or discussion but by executive order.
This Agenda is not Empowerment of American Minorities
It's not about black lives matter. The lives of red, brown, black, and white Americans don't matter, though the goal is the deconstruction of a unified culture via the establishment of a heterotopian nation consisting of disturbing, intense, incompatible, and contradictory cultures achieved waves of immigrants from other cultures. It is the program of both Joe Biden and George Soros that have been described in YouTube videos that have been deleted. Newsweek, however, says, "Alex Soros, the son of billionaire George Soros, has issued a warning to Democrats about the presidential election ahead of a pivotal press conference for President Joe Biden...Alex Soros, the chair of the nonprofit Open Society Foundations (OSF), took to X (formerly Twitter), to urge Democrats to unite around Biden" ("Joe Biden Gets Support From George Soros' Son Ahead of Key Press Conference"). Why? Because Biden and his vice president would continue Soros's program. For example, "The OSF has been a major financial supporter of US immigration reform, including establishing a pathway to citizenship for undocumented immigrants" ("OSF," Wikipedia). "Underneath its lofty rhetoric, the organization was clearly devoted to the eradication of national sovereignty, ("Connoisseur of Chaos: The dystopian vision of George Soros, billionaire funder of the Left," by Stefan Kanfer, City Journal).
The subtext is to minoritize the white population of nations dominated by European descendants. This is achieved by waves of immigrants from non-European nations. From the Center of Immigration Studies: "The last four decades of mass immigration did not just happen by chance. Complex social and political forces drove the demographic transformation that has added 55 million people to the U.S. population since 1980" ("A Review of Open Borders Inc.: Who's Funding America's Destruction?, by Michelle Malkin"). Mirroring the agenda of the Democratic Party, Harris represents migrants, not black Americans. There are plenty of black American women capable of being president of the United States, certainly more qualified than the last two. But the agenda was never about celebrating and empowering black women or black Americans generally. It was always about transforming America into a decentralized post-America heterotopia that makes an absolute break with the traditional America. The agenda is a Brave New America.
Mission not yet Accomplished
Biden has hung on, so Kamala hasn’t become president as a result of his demise. So on to plan B: President Biden drops out of the race and endorses Kamala for president, fulfilling his deal with the now radically left Democratic Party that brought him to power. However, like Biden, she would have to be elected as his former vice president. And like him, she would have no chance of winning if she weren’t running against the greatly despised Donald Trump who “has the dubious honor of being the only U.S. president to face impeachment twice.” And let's add to that Best Buddy and admirer of mass murderer Vladimir Putin. (https://www.cbsnews.com/pictures/presidents-ranked-worst-best/)
However, like Hillary Clinton, Kamala is encumbered by a great burden, but Hillary was simply disliked in the way Trump is disliked. Kamala, on the other hand, is disliked and feared. Hillary and Trump were not considered threats to the integrity of the nation, whereas Kamala does represent such a threat. If she were president of the United States, immigrants would have a champion in the highest office in the land. She would be able to bring to fruition the Great American Multicultural Experiment that would marginalize traditional Americans—black and white. The threat of Hispanic immigrants to blacks is not that they are taking jobs from blacks but that they are taking over black communities. Read Steven Malanga’s “The Rainbow Coalition Evaporates: Black anger grows as illegal immigrants transform urban neighborhoods”: https://www.city-journal.org/article/the-rainbow-coalition-evaporates.
The future that both black and traditional white Americans fear is described in these stories:
Fear of the future and fear of that political juggernaut the Democratic Party are two among many reasons that Kamala Harris will lose the election.
Whoever wins, the country will remain divided by hatred. How did America come to this?
